Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| -- | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has an overall score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S25's 82.6 overall score. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version, counting with a lot of extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a quite higher pixel number in each screen inch and way more brightness.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has as much storage for games and applications as Samsung Galaxy S25, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures and a higher 50 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy S25 and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro count with very similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.