Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-08 |
| -- | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a little bit better than the Galaxy S25, having an 86.6 score against 82.6. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the previous 10 version and Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S25 features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher display pixels density.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy S25. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a way better video quality and a bigger camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3's memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Samsung Galaxy S25's one, both have equal internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has superior battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has 4720mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.