Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-08 |
| -- | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a global score of 90.1, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S25's 82.6 global score. These phones use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14. The Galaxy S25 counts with a sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a bit smaller display, a lot worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit worse display density.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a way better hardware performance than Galaxy S25. Both have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S25 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a way lower 50 mega pixels resolution camera, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a way better video definition and a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.