Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-05-06 |
| -- | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| -- | 7.41 ounces |
| -- | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S25, having a score of 88.3 against 82.6. These phones use Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy S25 has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with way more brightness and a little higher pixels density. Xiaomi Black Shark 4's storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy S25 one, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S25 features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera in the back with a better resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.