Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-01 |
| -- | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.62 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S25, having a overall score of 87.9 against 82.6. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 10T has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14. The Xiaomi Mi 10T features an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a much brighter display and a little higher display density. Xiaomi Mi 10T and Samsung Galaxy S25 both feature quite similar storage to store more apps and games, both of them have the same internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video and a tinier camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with greater battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.