Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-13 |
| -- | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.57 ounces |
| -- | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, with a overall score of 82.6 against 81.2. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has Android 10, so it gives you a lot of extra features. Galaxy S25's body is notably thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite.
Galaxy S25 features a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S25 counts with much more memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S25 features a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 21% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.