Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 90 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-01 |
| -- | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S25, getting a 90 score against 82.6. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14. Galaxy S25 has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density and much more brightness.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light situations, a back-facing camera with a lot higher 108 MP resolution and a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro and Galaxy S25 both have similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has greater battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.