Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-15 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's general score of 81.4. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S25 has the previous 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy S25 is a noticeably thinner and much lighter device than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a way brighter display and a quite larger screen. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with as much memory capacity for apps and games as the Galaxy S25 one, both of them have equal internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S25 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a back camera with a higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy S25 has better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.