Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-05-17 |
| -- | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 7.16 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Max, having a general score of 82.6 against 77.5. The Samsung Galaxy S25 construction is much thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Mi Max. The Galaxy S25 has a way better screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little higher pixels amount per display inch.
Xiaomi Mi Max features a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Mi Max also has an external SD slot that allows up to 256 GB.
Galaxy S25 features a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a bigger aperture, a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition. Xiaomi Mi Max features greater battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has a 21% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.