Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-04-03 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a bit better than the Galaxy S25, getting an 83.8 score against 82.6. Galaxy S25 counts with a better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a bit more pixels per display inch, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite larger screen. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25. Both have 8 cpu cores and 8 GB of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a greater camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution, a way larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy S25 counts with superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has an 18 percent greater battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.