Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-11-01 |
| -- | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a bit better than the Galaxy S25, with a overall score of 83.8 against 82.6. Samsung Galaxy S25 features a brighter display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with much more display brightness and a quite better display pixel density.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S25. Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy S25 features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a lot more MP camera in the back, a much higher video resolution and a much larger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a way bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S25 has better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.