Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-07-14 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, with an 82.6 score against 78.7. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10, giving some nice extra features. The Galaxy S25 body is much thinner and notably lighter than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 has an incredibly better display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen density.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a way better video definition and a more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.