Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-27 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3's 78.2 global score. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has 14 version while Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10, so it provides you a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy S25's design is notably lighter and a lot thinner than the Xiaomi Poco M3.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with an extremely better CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 has a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a just a little better pixels number per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy S25 has a much better camera than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a way better video definition, a back camera with a better 50 mega pixels resolution and a much larger camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S25, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.