Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-08 |
| -- | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's overall score of 81.6. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has a newer 14 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10. The Galaxy S25 body is lighter and way thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much better display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a really brighter display and a just a bit better screen pixel density. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little bit better memory for applications and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much greater performance than Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S25 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a way less mega pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures and a larger aperture.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has better battery duration than Galaxy S25, because it has a 29% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.