Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-20 |
| -- | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy S25, having an 83.4 score against 82.6. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has older 11 version while Galaxy S25 has Android 14. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 has a better display than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy S25 shoots better videos and photos than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a lot better video resolution, a much bigger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs and a back camera with more MP. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features superior battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.