Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2021-01-18 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, with an 82.6 score against 78.2. Galaxy S25 is a a lot thinner and extremely lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version, counting with a couple additional features.
Galaxy S25 has a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a just a little better pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 captures better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a back-facing camera with a higher 50 megapixels resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a way higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.