Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.30 ounces |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S25, with an 86.1 score against 82.6. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14. Galaxy S25 features a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, although it has a bit inferior pixel amount per screen inch, a little smaller screen and a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features an extremely better processor than Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy S25 takes slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light captures and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro and Galaxy S25 both have really similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features superior battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.