Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-11-23 |
| -- | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.42 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, having a general score of 82.6 against 77.2. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a much lighter and extremely thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher screen density, a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and much more brightness.
The Galaxy S25 features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher video quality, a larger aperture and a lot better resolution back camera. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features just a bit bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a battery life that's very similar to the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy S25.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.