Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-01-15 |
| -- | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's global score of 80.3. The Samsung Galaxy S25 body is noticeably thinner and extremely lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a just a bit higher pixels count per inch of screen. The Galaxy S25 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a battery life that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S25 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.