Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo
GT-I9300I| Global Score | |
| 66.2 | 72.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-06-12 |
| 5.38 x 2.79 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 6.68 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8226 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 330 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Fast has a score of 72.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S3 Neo's score of 66.2. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Motorola Moto G Fast has an older 11 version and Galaxy S3 Neo has Android 4.4.4. Even being the best device in this review, Motorola Moto G Fast's construction is noticeably heavier and a bit thicker than Galaxy S3 Neo.
Moto G Fast features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S3 Neo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S3 Neo has a brighter display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit worse 1280 x 720 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
The Moto G Fast shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy S3 Neo, because it has a much better video definition and a much more megapixels camera in the back. The Motorola Moto G Fast has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S3 Neo, because it has more internal storage and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S3 Neo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2100mAh.
Moto G Fast not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.