Global Score | |
60.4 | 64.8 |
Basic Information | |
Samsung | Nokia |
Android 4.2 | Android 9.0 Pie |
2014-03-15 | 2019-06-10 |
5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
4.90 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
Black and White | Black |
-- | Metal and Plastic |
-- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
$ 90.00 | $ 90.00 |
Display / Screen | |
4.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
TFT | IPS LCD |
245 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
7.8 | 7.3 |
Performance | |
-- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
Yes GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
8.1 | 8.73 |
Storage | |
8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
4.62 | 8.12 |
Camera | |
5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
-- | f/2.00 aperture |
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
5.94 | 8.47 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
4.6 | 6.1 |
Battery Life | |
2100mAh Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
4 | 4.96 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
GPS | GPS |
Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
-- | FM Radio |
The Nokia 3.1 A is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, getting a score of 64.8 against 60.4. The Nokia 3.1 A construction is extremely newer and a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim's, although it's somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but Nokia 3.1 A has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has Android 4.2 version.
The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 3.1 A also has 1 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim counts with a bit sharper display than Nokia 3.1 A, although it has a little smaller display, a just a little worse screen density and a way lower resolution of 960 x 540px.
The Nokia 3.1 A features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia 3.1 A also has a back facing camera with much more MP. Nokia 3.1 A has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 128 GB and 24 GB more internal storage.
The Nokia 3.1 A features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has a 2990mAh battery capacity.
Nokia 3.1 A costs exactly the same than Galaxy S3 Slim.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.