Search


Compare phones

Global Score
60.464.8
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
Android 4.2Android 9.0 Pie
2014-03-152019-06-10
5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches
4.90 ounces5.50 ounces
Black and WhiteBlack
--Metal and Plastic
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 90.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
4.5 inches5.5 inches
540 x 960 pixels 1440 x 720 pixels
TFTIPS LCD
245 pixels per inch293 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
7.87.3
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset
Quad-Core 1200 MHz processorARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor
1 GB RAM2 GB RAM
Yes GPUAdreno 504 GPU
8.18.73
Storage
8 GB internal memory32 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
4.628.12
Camera
5.00 MP + 0.30 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
5.948.47
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
Mobile HotspotMobile Hotspot
HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSMLTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA
Micro SIMNano SIM
4.66.1
Battery Life
2100mAh Battery2990mAh Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
44.96
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.0, EDRBluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity SensorAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Nokia 3.1 A is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, getting a score of 64.8 against 60.4. The Nokia 3.1 A construction is extremely newer and a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim's, although it's somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but Nokia 3.1 A has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has Android 4.2 version.

The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 3.1 A also has 1 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim counts with a bit sharper display than Nokia 3.1 A, although it has a little smaller display, a just a little worse screen density and a way lower resolution of 960 x 540px.

The Nokia 3.1 A features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia 3.1 A also has a back facing camera with much more MP. Nokia 3.1 A has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 128 GB and 24 GB more internal storage.

The Nokia 3.1 A features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has a 2990mAh battery capacity.

Nokia 3.1 A costs exactly the same than Galaxy S3 Slim.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.