Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 75.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-03-14 | 2019-02-07 |
| 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black and White |
| Polycarbonate | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S4 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G7, getting a global score of 76.1 against 75.2. The Galaxy S4 design has the same thickness than Motorola Moto G7, but it is lighter. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S4 has the older 4.4.2 version while Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S4 counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has 2 GB less RAM and 4 less processing cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Galaxy S4 features a more vivid display than Moto G7, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels number per inch in the screen.
The Moto G7 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 48 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G7 features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
The Motorola Moto G7 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy S4 is also cheaper than the other phone, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.