Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | -- |
| 2013-06-05 | 2015-10-08 |
| 5.50 x 2.81 x 0.36 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and Orange | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 595.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S4 Active, with a 77.7 score against 71.7. The LG V10 is a extremely newer and a little bit thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy S4 Active, but it is also noticeably heavier. The Galaxy S4 Active has a little faster processing unit than LG V10, because although it has lesser RAM and lesser processing cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy S4 Active counts with a bit sharper screen than LG V10, although it has a bit smaller display, a lot lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a just a bit lower pixels density. The LG V10 counts with a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S4 Active, because it has 48 GB more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V10 features a very superior camera than Galaxy S4 Active, because it has a way better video definition and a camera with lot more mega pixels. The LG V10 counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy S4 Active, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, LG V10 is also cheap compared to the other phone, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.