Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-06-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.50 x 2.81 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and Orange | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 595.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Galaxy S4 Active, getting a 92.3 score against 71.7. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a notably newer and incredibly thinner cellphone than Galaxy S4 Active, but it is somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version and Galaxy S4 Active has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a better performing CPU than Galaxy S4 Active, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S4 Active has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater display pixel density.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S4 Active, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot more mega pixels camera. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S4 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has better battery life than Galaxy S4 Active, because it has a 27% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a little more money than Samsung Galaxy S4 Active, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.