Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Pink, Purple, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1900 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition's 72.2 overall score. The Google Pixel 3 is a heavier device than Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition, but both have the same thickness. The Galaxy S4 Value Edition features a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because it has 2 GB more RAM and more cores. Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory.
The Google Pixel 3 has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because it has a 12 percent more battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 3 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.