Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Pink, Purple, Red and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Quad-Core 1900 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the Galaxy S4 Value Edition, with a general score of 87 against 72.2. The Motorola razr (2020) body has the same thickness than the Galaxy S4 Value Edition, but it is a lot heavier. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version while Galaxy S4 Value Edition has Android 4.4.2 version.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit superior processor than Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because it has 6 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. Galaxy S4 Value Edition counts with a more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little better screen pixel density and a quite better 1920 x 1080px resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better battery life than Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because it has a 2800mAh battery size instead of 2600mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S4 Value Edition, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S4 Value Edition. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy S4 Value Edition, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.