Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Pink, Purple, Red and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 1900 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than the Galaxy S4 Value Edition's 72.2 general score. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version while Galaxy S4 Value Edition has Android 4.4.2. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is way heavier but a bit thinner than Galaxy S4 Value Edition.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a faster processor than Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). The Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip has better battery performance than Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.