Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Pink, Purple, Red and White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1900 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has an overall score of 76.6, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition's 72.2 score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition has Android 4.4.2 version. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's construction is much heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition.
Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a back camera with a much higher resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 128 GB and 64 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a way better battery duration than Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 costs a bit more than Galaxy S4 Value Edition, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.