Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S5
32 GBSM-G901F
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-06-23 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Red and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 399.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 has a score of 80.8, which is slightly better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. The Galaxy S5 is an extremely older and somewhat thicker cellphone than Moto Z Force, but Samsung could make it lighter anyway. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy S5 has older 4.4.2 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Galaxy S5 has a much better screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a little smaller screen and a lot lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy S5 has a bit better performance than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S5 also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Motorola Moto Z Force's camera is just as good as Galaxy S5's camera, and although the Motorola Moto Z Force has a back camera with a lot better 21 MP resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images, they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution.
Moto Z Force features a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Moto Z Force features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S5, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Galaxy S5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S5, else you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z Force, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.