Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 305.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7580 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is much better than Galaxy S5 Neo's overall score of 70.8. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a newer 10 version and Galaxy S5 Neo has Android 5.1 version. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro construction is a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier than the Galaxy S5 Neo.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a superior performance than Galaxy S5 Neo, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Galaxy S5 Neo has a sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater display pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better battery duration than Galaxy S5 Neo, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Neo, because it has a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a back facing camera with lot more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.