Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | -- |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.11 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a bit better than Galaxy S5 Plus, getting a overall score of 82.2 against 78.1. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a a lot thinner and noticeably lighter device than the Galaxy S5 Plus. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has older 14 version and Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a way better 1920 x 1080 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a very superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 14 GB lesser RAM memory and 4 lesser cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and better video frame rate.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.