Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an overall score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus's 78.1 overall score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2 version. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, but both have the same thickness.
The Galaxy S5 Plus features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 6 GB lesser RAM and 4 less processing cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a more vivid display than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a bit greater pixel quantity per inch of display, a better 1256 x 2760 resolution and a bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better storage for apps and games than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 54% larger battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos, a larger camera aperture and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.