Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, having an 86.3 score against 78.1. These phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2 version. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a noticeably heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, but both have the same thickness.
The Galaxy S5 Plus has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit sharper display than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a much bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a superior battery life than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 61 percent larger battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot more megapixels camera, a much larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a way larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.