Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Galaxy S5 Plus, having an 87.1 score against 78.1. These phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the older 14 version while Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is newer, but much heavier and a little thicker than Galaxy S5 Plus.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has 10 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has a little inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a much bigger display and a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a greater camera than Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot bigger aperture for better photography and video in low light environments, better video frame rate, a camera in the back with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger sensor.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.