Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Surfing blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, having a general score of 82.6 against 78.1. Even though the Moto G 5G Plus is way newer than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, it's much heavier and a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus features a much better screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater display pixel density.
The Galaxy S5 Plus features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a way larger aperture for better photos in low light environments and a lot bigger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.