Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G71 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy S5 Plus, with an 82.9 score against 78.1. The Moto G71 5G design is extremely newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than Galaxy S5 Plus. These phones have Android operating system, but the Moto G71 5G has the older 11 version and Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2.
The Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a better looking screen than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixels density. Motorola Moto G71 5G features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional GPU. The Motorola Moto G71 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G71 5G also has faster video frame rates, a back camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations.
Moto G71 5G features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.