Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-06-23 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has a score of 78.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has the previous 4.4.2 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus is a way older and thicker device than Motorola Moto Z Force, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter anyway.
Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S5 Plus also counts with a graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus features a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, a quite smaller display and a bit lower display pixel density.
Moto Z Force takes a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto Z Force also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations and a lot more mega pixels camera.
The Moto Z Force has a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force has longer battery performance than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola Moto Z Force, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.