Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2016-07-28 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has a score of 78.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's general score of 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus design is lighter than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but it's somewhat thicker and was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a little bit lower pixel density, a little bit smaller screen and a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a slightly better camera than Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a much more megapixels camera in the back and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition has better battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.