Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 15 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 432 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an overall score of 79.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S5 Plus's global score of 78.1. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has older 15 version and Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a way newer and incredibly thinner phone than Galaxy S5 Plus, although it's a lot heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus features a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has lesser CPU cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a much smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 496 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a really longer battery life than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a greater camera than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and videos, a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.