Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, with a general score of 91.3 against 78.1. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is much newer, but just a little bit thicker and much heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy S5 Plus features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 less cpu cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Galaxy S5 Plus features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels number per display inch.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a much bigger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and 112 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 61% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.