Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Galaxy S5 Plus, with a 92.3 score against 78.1. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2 version. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is way newer and thinner than the Galaxy S5 Plus's, but it's also much heavier.
The Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a way smaller display and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better performance than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has a lot less megapixels back-facing camera and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light photos and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features improved battery duration than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than Galaxy S5 Plus, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.