Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 4.4.2 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2014-06-23 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 has a global score of 83.3, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's global score of 77.8. IPhone 11's design is way newer and a little thinner than Galaxy S5 Sport's, although it is heavier. IPhone 11 counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy S5 Sport works with Android 4.4.2 OS.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a more vivid display than Apple iPhone 11, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a quite better 1920 x 1080 resolution. IPhone 11 features a faster processing unit than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM, a larger number of cores (and faster) and a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone 11 has a better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal memory. IPhone 11 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos and a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Apple iPhone 11 counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 3110mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S5 Sport. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S5 Sport, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.