Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 4.4.2 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-10-23 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 has a score of 88.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's score of 77.8. Apple iPhone 12's construction is notably newer and somewhat thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport. Apple iPhone 12 has iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with Android 4.4.2 OS.
The Apple iPhone 12 features a greater hardware performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores , more RAM and a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone 12 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a better 1170 x 2532 resolution, a little bit better screen density and a larger screen.
The iPhone 12 counts with more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone 12 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a lower video quality and a lot lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy S5 Sport and the iPhone 12 have extremely similar batteries performance, although the iPhone 12 also has 2815mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S5 Sport. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy S5 Sport, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.