Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 4.4.2 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-10-23 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, with a 92.8 score against 77.8. Apple iPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy S5 Sport counts with Android 4.4.2 operating system. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro body is way newer and thinner than Galaxy S5 Sport's, although it is somewhat heavier.
IPhone 12 Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels, a bit higher pixels quantity in each screen inch and a larger screen. The iPhone 12 Pro counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a greater performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 2 more CPU cores, a 64-bits CPU and more RAM memory. Galaxy S5 Sport and iPhone 12 Pro feature extremely similar batteries performance, although the iPhone 12 Pro also has a 1% bigger battery capacity.
IPhone 12 Pro takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a way lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture to capture better photography in low light situations.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S5 Sport. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 12 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy S5 Sport, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.