Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, with an 88.1 score against 77.8. The iPhone X design is notably newer and thinner than the Galaxy S5 Sport's, although it's also a little bit heavier. IPhone X counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores , a 64 bits processor and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S5 Sport features just a bit better screen than iPhone X, although it has a just a bit inferior pixels number per inch of display, a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px. The iPhone X has a slightly better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality, a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality videos and photos, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Apple iPhone X has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy S5 Sport features just a bit longer battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S5 Sport. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy S5 Sport, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.