Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's overall score of 77.8. Google Pixel 3 is a noticeably newer device, and it's also just a little lighter and thinner than Galaxy S5 Sport. Google Pixel 3 has a processor that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport one, because although the Google Pixel 3 has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and 4 more cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit better display than Google Pixel 3, although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a bit smaller screen. Google Pixel 3 counts with more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4 percent larger battery size. Google Pixel 3 has a camera that's just as good as Galaxy S5 Sport's camera, because although the Google Pixel 3 has a lot lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments and a larger sensor taking better quality pictures and videos.
The Google Pixel 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.