Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than Galaxy S5 Sport, with an 82.9 score against 77.8. The Google Pixel 4 XL construction is much newer and a little bit thinner than Galaxy S5 Sport's, but it's somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a little lower pixels count in each inch of display, a way lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a quite smaller screen.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better processing power than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and more cpu cores. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 48 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a camera that is just as good as the camera in Galaxy S5 Sport, because although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture and a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs.
Google Pixel 4 XL has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S5 Sport. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Galaxy S5 Sport, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.