Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's general score of 77.8. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is newer and a little bit thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has an older 11 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G and Galaxy S5 Sport feature very similar processing units, because although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with 4 GB more RAM and more cpu cores (although slower). The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a brighter display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a camera with lot less megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality pictures and a much bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a way better battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more money than Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.