Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is better than Galaxy S5 Sport, getting a general score of 89 against 77.8. Google Pixel 5's construction is extremely newer, thinner and a little lighter than Galaxy S5 Sport. The Galaxy S5 Sport features a brighter display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a bit greater pixel number in each display inch.
Google Pixel 5 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (but slower) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a lot less MP resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Google Pixel 5 has a much better battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4080mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Google Pixel 5 is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.