Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 12 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is just a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, having a 78.5 score against 77.8. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has an older 12 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion body is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but also a little heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has less cpu cores (although they are faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a way better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.